Thursday, January 7, 2010

State of the Economy (Marc Saluk)

We’ve all been told ‘Happy New Year’ plenty of times by this point and we all certainly hope that it is. Many of us have control, to some extent, over just how happy our year is. Despite the economy, we can still try new things, begin new relationships, give back to our communities, and so on. But regarding that economy, most of us feel… and rightfully so… that 2010 will come with many of the same challenges that we all felt in 2009.

However, there are many things that we as a society, as a community, and as individuals can do to create a brighter economic future beyond 2010… and one of those opportunities is just around the proverbial corner. On February 2nd, voters in the Greenville City Schools district will go to the polls to vote on the possible construction of a new Grades 5 – 8 school building for the districts’ students.

What’s the connection? A new school improves educational opportunities for Greenville students and therefore impacts the community and economic development. It does this through the creation of a better trained workforce and by helping attract, and retain, businesses to the area. What does that all mean?

Jobs. I’ll say it again because I can’t emphasize it enough. Jobs.

A new school building will help create jobs, prosperity, and a future for our community. Education is intractably connected to economic development. This is not my opinion- it’s a fact of modern society.
When companies evaluate a community, education is one of the primary topics of discussion. How effective are the schools? What kind of infrastructure does the district have? Is the community committed to education?

I am happy to say that the Greenville School District is very effective under the current administration with the tools that they have been given. Now, we (and I say ‘we’ because I live within the school district and have a step daughter in that district) as a community need to give them the tools they need to take the district to the next level. Approval of a bond issue to help fund a new building is one of those tools.

When companies evaluate the Greenville community, they see that virtually every other town in the county and surrounding area already has a new school facility, already has new infrastructure suitable for the types of technology employed in today’s classrooms, already have shown a commitment to educate their future leaders to the best of their ability.

When these companies look at Greenville, they see a school district whose oldest building, South Middle School, is currently planning its centennial celebration. They see a district where the average age of the school facilities 69 years old. Please keep in mind that the computer hadn’t even been invented 69 years ago, not to mention a host of other modern classroom tools which hadn’t even been conceived of yet.

The structures currently in place simply do not accommodate these. They do not accommodate the type of classroom environment that creates competitive students today. We can tinker with them, refurbish them, add on to them; but in the end, I believe the best expenditure of money is to create a fresh start with modern tools. If approved, this new middle school can be a show piece for the district and help prepare our children for the modern economy.

CEO’s and others looking at our area for economic endeavors will not put in the time to see the good work that the district’s teachers and staff our doing within school walls. They will only see the walls. And those ageing walls serve on a daily basis as a barrier to economic advancement for the Greenville community.

Think to yourself this- if you were in management of a company looking to relocate to an area, which community would you pick? Would you pick the one where you could send your kids to a modern facility and where the area workforce was ready for the modern world? Or would you select the community where the district’s NEWEST building was built during the Kennedy administration (The high school was built in 1962)?

I have spent my first eight weeks as economic development director intently listening to the input of individuals and communities in and around our county. Outside the county, I can tell you without question that there exists a perception that Greenville is not committed to education. I can also tell you that, with the current administration in place under Superintendent Susie Riegle, that this is definitely not the case.

But we need to equip that administration with the tools to do the job right. They have earned that. Yes, a ‘yes’ vote on February 2nd will end up costing each of us a small sum of money. But it is not a cost… it is an investment, and it is one that we must make if we want Greenville to prosper. Jobs follow education and prosperity follows jobs.

Do we want to be sitting around together in 30 years discussing the glory days of Greenville at a coffee shop or do we want to be living them? The choices made right now will dictate that path. That first choice comes in February. My office is fully behind the Greenville School District’s efforts to create a modern facility for our children as well as a cornerstone for the future prosperity of the community. My sincerest wish is that everyone who reads this will feel the same way. Let’s support our children, our community, and our future.

[Marc Saluk is the Economic Development Director for Darke County and a Greenville area resident. His office number is 548-3250 and he can be reached through email at msaluk@darkecounty.com.]

25 comments:

  1. The new school is a great idea and i hope it passes.But what about the people that need jobs now and are not in a school?What is the economic future for us in this county?Is there any thing in the near future or far future that will help with employment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. New buildings have not helped create jobs. This is a blatant attempt to use the local lack of good jobs as a gimick to get people to vote for a new school building. There are no hard facts in this article, just an opinion. Before we lay down hard cash in the form of additional taxes in a community with over 10% unemployed and even more underemployed, we will need more than smoke and mirrors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I went to the old Jr. High over fifty years ago and it was old then. I remember a light fixture fell out of the ceiling during a basketball game. Just plain lucky no one was injured. I don't know the figures, but think how much it must take to heat that old building. Our kids deserve better.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bricks & Mortar do not improve education. The Jr. High Building is old, but so is Memorial Hall. Heating Systems & the Insulation of a building can be changed and improved. I’m not saying we do not need a new school, but the points given do not justify building one.

    As far as jobs in this community, there needs to be a big change in the mentality of the leadership within our community and country. One of the major things that started to create jobs when President Jimmy Carter had us in this mess was a reduction of taxes and the introduction of ITC (Investment Tax Credit) program. You can throw all of the borrowed money you want, but until you create jobs within this community and country the economy will never come back strong.

    Sure I think everyone in Greenville would love to see new school buildings, but the question becomes can the people and businesses afford it today.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "A rising tide raises all ships." This is a prudent, well-thought out project and operationally makes a lot of sense. I am supporting the bond issue and the new school. I also believe there is a direct connection between quality schools, school buildings, and economic development.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with John and Anonymous January 7, 2010 6:39 PM. How can we think about raising taxes with 10% or maybe even higher unemployment. Look at all the underemployment around here. I would love to see the percentage of people in greenville that make less then 30,000 a year, or even less than 10 an hour. Why don't we focus on creating new jobs. Good jobs, not check cashing stores. Know this, like John said bricks and mortar does not make a good school system.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Besides improving the learning environment for the child, new buildings also create favorable first impressions to prospective families and businesses. One does not have to be a rocket scientist to figure this one out. I believe in our current administration, especially our superintendent. Also, I am impressed, for the most part, by our teachers. We have a quality staff. However, people moving in do not have the time to get acquainted with our administration, faculty and staff. Their first impressions include the quality of the school buildings and grounds. People look at the schools before moving into a community. How much proof do you need? If you were moving into a community, wouldn't you look at the schools first? Perhaps not. I would.

    Even with 10% unemployment, we can still afford this levy. The amount is between 30 - 40 cents per day for a family in a $100,000 home. This will not break anyone's back.

    Folks, we can do this. It's needed for our kids. It's needed for our community.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I tell you I just read a flyer on this issue at hittles and it says the school board hasnt had any debt since 2001.So what I gather from that is that they payed cash to fix the jr. high and payed cash for the property they purchased.It allso said that the state was only paying 8.8 million of the 33 million to build this school.Where does all the lottery money go isnt that supposed to go for new schools and what not.I think it is all a bunch of lies and padding politicians pockets that all ready get payed by the tax payers.

    ReplyDelete
  9. To LL,
    People who care about their childrens education don't just look at the school building. They look at the schools report card, how they rank in their county or city. A new building won't make our schools report card improve.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Some of the best minds in american history went to a one room school and some of them didnt evan go to school.

    ReplyDelete
  11. If a doctor, business, franchise, or factory were looking for a community to settle in, what would they look for?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Taxes, Workforce, Infrastructure, Location, Cost of Property, School System, and of course Crime.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Apparently LL has no idea what many families are dealing with in this community. First of all the majority do not make anywhere near $100,000 a year. Until I see significant improvements in the academic standings of Greenville schools, I could not possible by content with administration. There needs to be deep cuts in administration. The money can come from the top. They seem to be completely out of touch with reality, but with salaries of over $100,000, they are insulated from the real world.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mark Saluk was making pizza a year ago...credibility? Anyone else see a problem?

    ReplyDelete
  15. LL said a $100,000 home, not salary. Big difference. This is a tax on real estate, not income.

    ReplyDelete
  16. To all the nay sayers - let's give Mr. Saluk the opportunity to do the job. All the activists of the community need to step aside, put down their egos, and stay home. Economic development is a function of passion, Mark Saluk can be successful in leading economic development for our community.

    ReplyDelete
  17. What, no democracy here? If you bring up any questions, just sit down and be quiet while the sheep spend our money and decide our direction. That is what is killing this community. Put a levy on a special ballot in February so no one will notice, show up or quesiton it's validity.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 11:53...Surely you jest. You have to see the signs all over town. If you read the paper you will see notices about the bond issue, with plenty of information given as to the reason why now is the time, and not later. You can vote no, but I hope you will at least get educated about the facts before you make such a decision. There are plenty of opportunities to learn about the importance of this levy. It's also very affordable, and is one of the wisest investments this community will ever make. Vote no if you wish, but only do so if you have heard and understand all the facts.

    (Now, speaking of democracy, I hope DJ posts this. Something happened to the last post I made on this issue.)

    ReplyDelete
  19. “Now is the Time” signs? heaves it took me several weeks before I even knew what those signs were for…

    ReplyDelete
  20. I agree with John H. (January 8 post)about bricks and mortar do not a good school make. From every indication from the Advocate's video of South School, maintenance is not being done properly--so what would a new school look like after five years? If I were the head of school maintenance, I would be embarrassed.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I am not a fan of the Superintendent who tries to make all of the decisions for the entire district, and I mean all. But, I know we need a new school for our community, so I will vote yes.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Now is not the time for higher taxes,which where we are headed. The next item will be an operating levy to pay for operation. Along with the raises that these administrators will demand.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I know a couple of teachers at the jr. high and they are against this levy.january 9 3:55 is right there needs to be cuts to anybody making over $100,000 a year what do they do to earn that much money a year?invent a new car that gets 1000 miles to the gallon.

    ReplyDelete
  24. In response to "Anonymous" January 9, 2010 and his criticism of Marc Saluk:

    It is one thing to voice your opinions, for or against whatever it is you happen to be for or against. It is a vital part of a healthy democracy. It's another thing entirely to make ad hominem attacks against someone and, even further it is cowardly to make completely untrue statements about someone while hiding behind the cloak of "anonymous.

    Allow me to set the record straight. Marc Saluk (spelled with a "c" not a "k") was not "making pizza a year ago". Clearly "anonymous" is making reference to Marc's employment with my company,Marco's Pizza, which ended late in 2007. Clearly not "a year ago".

    But to "anonymous" maybe how long ago he actually worked with me is as irrelevant a detail as is the correct spelling of his name. Perhaps it is simply the fact that he "was making pizzas" at all, at any time of his life, that troubles "anonymous".

    Please allow me to shed a little light onto exactly what Marc did while with my company. Though Marc had prior restaurant experience he had no pizza experience whatsoever and it wasn't even his restaurant background that I was looking to capitalize on when I convinced him to move here from D.C., where he was living at the time. He was brought on specifically because of his public relations skills, his ability to adapt, to think out of the box and to see the "big picture". I brought him here to help take a broken, bankrupt and forgotten business and help ressurect it all the while freeing up my time to - yes, you guessed it - make pizzas.

    In the end, all that can be said about Marc is that he was an integral player in the early years of growing a company that was dead and forgotten to the company it is today: the most decorated and awarded and #1 Marco's in the country that now employees dozens of people here in Greenville.

    Of course that was years ago - since then he has been a very active member of our community in such roles as News Director at WTGR and News Editor at the Daily Avocate among many other things.

    But I suppose those irrelevant little details that don't concern "anonymous". Plus they aren't as easy to fit into snarky little sarcastic comments.

    Jack Alexander
    Owner/Operator
    Marco's Pizza, Greenville OH

    ReplyDelete
  25. Thanks Jack for that information. I thought about rejecting that earlier comment, but sometime you have to shine light on stupidity. The part that makes me mad is that the commenter took such a dim view of "making pizza." Since when is it bad to work an honest job such as making pizza? It sounds like Marc wasn't actually making pizza, but if he was then so what? It's an honest job - and honestly an insult to the people out there who are making pizza - and making a living at "regular jobs." I'm also a little sick of the elitist mentality everywhere. There is a lot of talent out there in the world being wasted - in prt because good people don't get a chance because they lack connections, an Ivy League education, whatever.

    I don't know the anonymous jackass who left that comment, but I would take any of Jack Alexander's current employees first before him/her if I needed to fill a job.

    ReplyDelete

Featured Posts

/* Track outbound links in Google Analytics */